پولیس کی رائے کی قانونی حیثیت۔
2021 SCMR 612
پولیس کی رائے کی قانونی حیثیت۔
2021 SCMR 612
Opinion of the investigating officer – not admissible ۔
................................
The opinion of a Police Officer who has investigated the case as to the guilt or innocence of an accused person is not a relevant fact, and is therefore not admissible, under the Qanun-eShadat Order, 1984; as he is not an “expert” within the meaning of that term as used in Article 59 of the Qanun-e-Shadat Order, 1984. Even the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) does not authorize him to form such an opinion. To determine guilt or innocence of an accused person alleged to be involved in the commission of an offence is a judicial function that can only be performed by a court of law. This judicial function cannot be delegated to the Police Officer investigating the case. The Police Officers are empowered under the provisions of Chapter XIV of the Cr.P.C, only to investigate the non-cognizable offence with the order of a Magistrate and the cognizable offence without such order. This power of investigation, in no way, includes the power to determine guilt or innocence of the accused persons. An investigation, as defined in Section 4(1)(l) of the Cr.P.C, includes all proceedings under the Cr.P.C for the collection of evidence conducted by a Police Officer or by any other person authorized by a Magistrate. This definition makes it clear that the assignment of a Police Officer conducting an investigation is limited to the collection of evidence, and the evidence when collected has to be placed by him before the competent court of law. Only the court has the power and duty to form an opinion about the guilt or innocence of an accused person and to adjudicate accordingly on the basis of evidence produced before it. An opinion formed by the investigating officer as to the non-existence or existence of sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion to justify the forwarding of an accused person to a Magistrate under sections 169 and 170 of the Cr.P.C does not tantamount to opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused person. And despite such opinion of the investigating officer, the final determination even as to the existence or non-existence of sufficient ground for further proceeding against the accused person is to be made by the Magistrate under Section 173(3) and 204(1) of the Cr.P.C on examining the material available on record, and not on the basis of that opinion of the investigating officer.3 Therefore, the reference to and reliance on the opinion of the investigating officer by the High Court in its judgment was also legally untenable.
................................
The opinion of a Police Officer who has investigated the case as to the guilt or innocence of an accused person is not a relevant fact, and is therefore not admissible, under the Qanun-eShadat Order, 1984; as he is not an “expert” within the meaning of that term as used in Article 59 of the Qanun-e-Shadat Order, 1984. Even the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) does not authorize him to form such an opinion. To determine guilt or innocence of an accused person alleged to be involved in the commission of an offence is a judicial function that can only be performed by a court of law. This judicial function cannot be delegated to the Police Officer investigating the case. The Police Officers are empowered under the provisions of Chapter XIV of the Cr.P.C, only to investigate the non-cognizable offence with the order of a Magistrate and the cognizable offence without such order. This power of investigation, in no way, includes the power to determine guilt or innocence of the accused persons. An investigation, as defined in Section 4(1)(l) of the Cr.P.C, includes all proceedings under the Cr.P.C for the collection of evidence conducted by a Police Officer or by any other person authorized by a Magistrate. This definition makes it clear that the assignment of a Police Officer conducting an investigation is limited to the collection of evidence, and the evidence when collected has to be placed by him before the competent court of law. Only the court has the power and duty to form an opinion about the guilt or innocence of an accused person and to adjudicate accordingly on the basis of evidence produced before it. An opinion formed by the investigating officer as to the non-existence or existence of sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion to justify the forwarding of an accused person to a Magistrate under sections 169 and 170 of the Cr.P.C does not tantamount to opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused person. And despite such opinion of the investigating officer, the final determination even as to the existence or non-existence of sufficient ground for further proceeding against the accused person is to be made by the Magistrate under Section 173(3) and 204(1) of the Cr.P.C on examining the material available on record, and not on the basis of that opinion of the investigating officer.3 Therefore, the reference to and reliance on the opinion of the investigating officer by the High Court in its judgment was also legally untenable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment